– Metadata Editingīoth programs are capable of viewing and altering the metadata ( the text information embedded in the file, such as capture time, equipment used, and owner of the file) of images, but many users vote for Bridge as being the easier one to utilize for this purpose. This is especially useful for photographers who tend to have very large libraries of images. You can sort the images by various factors, such as stars, filenames, and more, in both programs.īridge and Lightroom can both create Collections and Smart Collections, further aiding on the organizational front by keeping sets of images within easy reach. This process is relatively quick and easy, enabling you to indicate important images for future use. In both Bridge and Lightroom Classic, you can Star, Flag, and organize images by marking them. You can find all of the same options in different places. Regarding image organization, both Bridge and Lightroom Classic share the same capabilities - they’re just different interfaces. Only exporting the image creates a new file, so you always have access to the original version. All of the editing is non-destructive your actual file won’t be changed because Lightroom simply remembers the changes but doesn’t apply them to the original file. You can’t get back to the original version.Īdobe Lightroom also doesn’t store the files themselves within the program, but it does allow you to perform edits on the files. ![]() However, the metadata changes and such alterations are permanent on the file(s). The program does not remember the status or settings for any of the files. But before we get into that, the biggest difference between the two that we have to get out of the way is how your files exist in these two programs.Īdobe Bridge simply shows you a preview of the folders and their contents. Adobe Bridge VS Adobe Lightroom ClassicĪ comparison is certainly in order with these two programs frequently going head-to-head in discussions. Where Bridge gets its greatest set of use is in the ability to easily (and quickly) batch alter metadata of files, mark and flag files, automate exporting workflows, quickly import files into your Adobe programs, and preview the files. Although Bridge is frequently seen alongside Photoshop within workflows, it does work with Adobe’s other programs, such as Adobe Portfolio and Adobe Stock. Today, Bridge can be downloaded for free from the Creative Cloud. Back when Photoshop had physical programs on disc, Bridge was always included in the mix! The above being said, Adobe Bridge is most often paired with Adobe Photoshop - because Bridge is a free program that is often included with Adobe Photoshop. This is pretty unique to Bridge and why multimedia artists love the program. This includes image files, video files, audio files, PDFs, and even more unique file types such as vectors and INDD files. ![]() Now, both Adobe and Bridge users use the term “creative assets” with this program because Adobe Bridge can view, edit, and organize any file type supported by Adobe’s wide range of programs. Think of the program as a computer file browser with a major update and improvement - many use Bridge to access and find files more easily than through a computer’s built-in file browsing system. In the simplest of terms, Adobe Bridge is an organizational software for creative assets. Let’s explore how these two programs compare to one another and which one is more worth your while. But unlike Lightroom, Adobe Bridge can also be utilized to organize non-image assets such as PDF files and documents. ![]() Where Adobe Bridge is almost exclusively an organizational tool, Lightroom adds editing capabilities as well. Both programs have key roles to play in image organization, but they are certainly not the same. Adobe Bridge often finds itself mentioned in conversation alongside Adobe Lightroom Classic, another popular software offering that photographers and creators use.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |